An entire organization and its suppliers and distribution networks making an honest mistake by activating an entire supply chain and marketing a product and updating the website? Come on we can’t be taken for granted like that. You know NONE of the publications who featured the watch last year said
It’s irrelevant what’s on a product. What matters is how it’s described to a customer and whether or not that product is what was marketed. The law does not define what constitutes limited by whether or not there is a numbered case. There are limited edition watches that aren’t numbered. What the la
This goes beyond the typical limited edition marketing angle. The same watch with the same reference number is just no longer limited. How can you not attempt to hold them accountable? It's a social obligation to have such vile behavious in the spotlight more than it is about a refund.